<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 116 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194C. The disallowance of making charges was deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence and arbitrary estimation, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 116 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition made under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS under Section 194C. The disallowance of making charges was deemed unsustainable due to lack of evidence and arbitrary estimation, emphasizing the importance of concrete evidence in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>