https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25076 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh affirmed in favor of the Revenue regarding the interpretation of capital expenditure for acquiring plant and machinery. The court found no substantial variance in the basic facts between assessments, leading to a rejection of a fresh examination. The court declined to address the second question and rejected the appeal certification request, citing the finality of a previous judgment and the consistency of facts across references. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:09:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25076 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh affirmed in favor of the Revenue regarding the interpretation of capital expenditure for acquiring plant and machinery. The court found no substantial variance in the basic facts between assessments, leading to a rejection of a fresh examination. The court declined to address the second question and rejected the appeal certification request, citing the finality of a previous judgment and the consistency of facts across references. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25076