<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405979</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition made under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2011-2012 was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not a shareholder of the related party, leading to the conclusion that section 2(22)(e) did not apply. The CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition was upheld, emphasizing that the transactions were not deemed dividends as argued by the Revenue but rather part of the ordinary course of business supported by ledger entries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 95 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405979</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition made under section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2011-2012 was dismissed. The Tribunal found that the appellant was not a shareholder of the related party, leading to the conclusion that section 2(22)(e) did not apply. The CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition was upheld, emphasizing that the transactions were not deemed dividends as argued by the Revenue but rather part of the ordinary course of business supported by ledger entries.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>