<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 719 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294274</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issues regarding the addition of Rs. 38,65,000 to share subscription money, the ad hoc disallowance of Rs. 50,000 out of various expenses, and the levy of interest under section 217 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to provide the appellant with necessary documents and opportunities for inspection and hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:43:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 719 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294274</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The issues regarding the addition of Rs. 38,65,000 to share subscription money, the ad hoc disallowance of Rs. 50,000 out of various expenses, and the levy of interest under section 217 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, were remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh consideration. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to provide the appellant with necessary documents and opportunities for inspection and hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>