<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25066</link>
    <description>A perpetual annuity payable under section 5(1) of the Sreepadam Lands Enfranchisement Act, 1969, in exchange for extinguishment of rights in land, was treated as a revenue receipt because it was a continuing annual payment rather than a capital sum paid by instalments; it was taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands. A power of attorney authorising another person to collect the statutory amount did not divert income at source because the amount had already accrued to the assessee under the statute, and the authorised collection was only an application of income. The statutory annuity and the amount collected were therefore assessable as income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:35:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 54 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25066</link>
      <description>A perpetual annuity payable under section 5(1) of the Sreepadam Lands Enfranchisement Act, 1969, in exchange for extinguishment of rights in land, was treated as a revenue receipt because it was a continuing annual payment rather than a capital sum paid by instalments; it was taxable in the assessee&#039;s hands. A power of attorney authorising another person to collect the statutory amount did not divert income at source because the amount had already accrued to the assessee under the statute, and the authorised collection was only an application of income. The statutory annuity and the amount collected were therefore assessable as income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>