https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25065 In prosecutions for serious income-tax evasion, issuance of bailable warrants does not by itself justify cancellation of bail or automatic re-arrest under inherent criminal jurisdiction. The Court stressed that economic offences must be treated with gravity, but cancellation of bail requires concrete material such as misuse of liberty, interference with witnesses, or obstruction of justice. On the facts, no such material was shown, and the accused had remained on bail without demonstrated abuse of process. The applications to cancel bail and to invoke inherent powers for re-arrest were therefore rejected. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:33:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25065 In prosecutions for serious income-tax evasion, issuance of bailable warrants does not by itself justify cancellation of bail or automatic re-arrest under inherent criminal jurisdiction. The Court stressed that economic offences must be treated with gravity, but cancellation of bail requires concrete material such as misuse of liberty, interference with witnesses, or obstruction of justice. On the facts, no such material was shown, and the accused had remained on bail without demonstrated abuse of process. The applications to cancel bail and to invoke inherent powers for re-arrest were therefore rejected. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 07 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25065