<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405965</link>
    <description>The writ petition challenging the order canceling petitioner&#039;s registration for non-filing of returns under TN VAT Act and GST regime was allowed. The court quashed the order due to lack of personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. The matter was remitted for fresh orders with the requirement of providing a personal hearing. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405965</link>
      <description>The writ petition challenging the order canceling petitioner&#039;s registration for non-filing of returns under TN VAT Act and GST regime was allowed. The court quashed the order due to lack of personal hearing, as mandated by Section 75(4) of the CGST Act. The matter was remitted for fresh orders with the requirement of providing a personal hearing. The writ petition was allowed without costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>