<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 68 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405952</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment was not justified as it was based on a change of opinion. The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 and set aside the subsequent assessment order. It emphasized that the technical mistake by the auditor did not amount to a failure to disclose material facts, and the company had fully complied with the disclosure requirements during the original assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 68 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405952</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment was not justified as it was based on a change of opinion. The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 and set aside the subsequent assessment order. It emphasized that the technical mistake by the auditor did not amount to a failure to disclose material facts, and the company had fully complied with the disclosure requirements during the original assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>