<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 67 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405951</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the CLB&#039;s order dated 12.02.2002 in C.P.No. 01 of 2001, finding it exceeded authority under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956. The CLB&#039;s directive for share transfer lacked just and equitable grounds necessary for winding up, contradicting established legal principles. The appeal was allowed without costs, and the connected application was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 67 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405951</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the CLB&#039;s order dated 12.02.2002 in C.P.No. 01 of 2001, finding it exceeded authority under Section 397 of the Companies Act, 1956. The CLB&#039;s directive for share transfer lacked just and equitable grounds necessary for winding up, contradicting established legal principles. The appeal was allowed without costs, and the connected application was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>