<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25059</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Department&#039;s power under section 131 to call for documents did not extend to deciding the truth or genuineness of a will. The original will had been retained for examination, but since scrutiny could be carried out from a xerox copy, continued retention of the original was not justified. The High Court directed return of the original will to the petitioner, subject to an undertaking to produce it whenever called for.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25059</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Department&#039;s power under section 131 to call for documents did not extend to deciding the truth or genuineness of a will. The original will had been retained for examination, but since scrutiny could be carried out from a xerox copy, continued retention of the original was not justified. The High Court directed return of the original will to the petitioner, subject to an undertaking to produce it whenever called for.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>