<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 39 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405923</link>
    <description>Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credit were not finally upheld or deleted, because the Tribunal found inconsistencies in the first appellate authority&#039;s reasoning and noted disputed confirmation and remand-report issues. To ensure proper examination of the loan transactions and additional material, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 39 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405923</link>
      <description>Unsecured loans treated as unexplained cash credit were not finally upheld or deleted, because the Tribunal found inconsistencies in the first appellate authority&#039;s reasoning and noted disputed confirmation and remand-report issues. To ensure proper examination of the loan transactions and additional material, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>