<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The show cause notice and order under section 263 were deemed invalid due to the absence of Document Identification Number (DIN) as per Circular No. 19/2019. The Tribunal found that the AO had properly considered the agricultural income and that the PCIT had substituted his opinion without proper basis, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:12:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the assessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest. The show cause notice and order under section 263 were deemed invalid due to the absence of Document Identification Number (DIN) as per Circular No. 19/2019. The Tribunal found that the AO had properly considered the agricultural income and that the PCIT had substituted his opinion without proper basis, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>