<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1922 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294262</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices was unwarranted. Despite initial non-cooperation, the assessee eventually submitted all required details, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion. The tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s overall cooperation and deemed the non-compliance as technical, ultimately overturning the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the ld. CIT (A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1922 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294262</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with notices was unwarranted. Despite initial non-cooperation, the assessee eventually submitted all required details, leading to the penalty&#039;s deletion. The tribunal considered the assessee&#039;s overall cooperation and deemed the non-compliance as technical, ultimately overturning the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the ld. CIT (A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>