https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405917 Writ jurisdiction was found unsuitable for resolving a cheque dispute turned on rival factual claims about whether the cheques were issued towards liability or stolen and misused, because such issues required evidence in the criminal proceedings. The note also states that temporary additional courts presided over by retired judicial officers could validly try cheque dishonour cases, as a Special Judicial Magistrate appointed for specified matters is competent under the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Negotiable Instruments Act only bars courts inferior to a Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate. The challenge to the forum's authority was therefore rejected. en-us Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:47:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405917 Writ jurisdiction was found unsuitable for resolving a cheque dispute turned on rival factual claims about whether the cheques were issued towards liability or stolen and misused, because such issues required evidence in the criminal proceedings. The note also states that temporary additional courts presided over by retired judicial officers could validly try cheque dishonour cases, as a Special Judicial Magistrate appointed for specified matters is competent under the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Negotiable Instruments Act only bars courts inferior to a Judicial Magistrate of the first class or Metropolitan Magistrate. The challenge to the forum's authority was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405917