<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 32 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405916</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues. Depreciation was allowed on property acquired in exchange for relinquishing tenancy rights and on the non-compete fee. The excess net book value over consideration paid for acquiring companies was held not taxable under Section 28(iv). The court found the decision in Aries Advertising Co. Ltd. inapplicable to the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 32 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405916</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on all issues. Depreciation was allowed on property acquired in exchange for relinquishing tenancy rights and on the non-compete fee. The excess net book value over consideration paid for acquiring companies was held not taxable under Section 28(iv). The court found the decision in Aries Advertising Co. Ltd. inapplicable to the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>