https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405905 The Division Bench admitted the writ appeal challenging the maintainability ruling by the Single Bench, citing exceptions to the restriction on entertaining writ petitions with alternate remedies. Regarding the exemption from excise duty, the court noted the appellant's favorable history in similar cases and upheld the exemption for supplies to the Special Economic Zone. The court dismissed the writ appeal, directing the appellant to pursue the available appellate remedy and admonishing them for their conduct. The appellant was allowed to file an appeal before the Tribunal within a specified timeframe. en-us Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405905 The Division Bench admitted the writ appeal challenging the maintainability ruling by the Single Bench, citing exceptions to the restriction on entertaining writ petitions with alternate remedies. Regarding the exemption from excise duty, the court noted the appellant's favorable history in similar cases and upheld the exemption for supplies to the Special Economic Zone. The court dismissed the writ appeal, directing the appellant to pursue the available appellate remedy and admonishing them for their conduct. The appellant was allowed to file an appeal before the Tribunal within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405905