<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 10 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (COURT NO. IV)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405894</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, declared a transaction of Plant and Machinery as fraudulent and canceled the sale of assets to a specific respondent under Sections 49 and 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found that the transaction was undervalued with fraudulent intent to defraud creditors. The sale was deemed to be in violation of the Code, leading to the assets&#039; repossession by the Resolution Professional to protect creditors&#039; interests. The suspended Directors were held accountable for the fraudulent activities and ordered to compensate the purchaser. This decision sets a precedent for combating fraudulent practices in insolvency proceedings and ensuring fairness to creditors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2021 08:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 10 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI (COURT NO. IV)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405894</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, declared a transaction of Plant and Machinery as fraudulent and canceled the sale of assets to a specific respondent under Sections 49 and 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Tribunal found that the transaction was undervalued with fraudulent intent to defraud creditors. The sale was deemed to be in violation of the Code, leading to the assets&#039; repossession by the Resolution Professional to protect creditors&#039; interests. The suspended Directors were held accountable for the fraudulent activities and ordered to compensate the purchaser. This decision sets a precedent for combating fraudulent practices in insolvency proceedings and ensuring fairness to creditors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>