https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405877 The appellant challenged the First Appellate Authority's Order, which reduced the redemption fine and penalty imposed for gold seized during a search operation. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine and penalty substantially. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's failure to meet the burden of proof regarding disproving smuggling suspicions and providing substantial rebuttal against the allegations. en-us Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405877 The appellant challenged the First Appellate Authority's Order, which reduced the redemption fine and penalty imposed for gold seized during a search operation. The Commissioner (Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, reducing the redemption fine and penalty substantially. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's failure to meet the burden of proof regarding disproving smuggling suspicions and providing substantial rebuttal against the allegations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405877