https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405861 The appeal was allowed, and both the addition of Rs. 15,20,000 as unexplained cash deposits and the disallowance of Rs. 66,09,875 for commission and development charges were deleted. The Tribunal found the evidence provided by the assessee to be sufficient to explain the deposits and supported the expenditures on commission and development charges. The decision was based on the adequacy of evidence and principles of natural justice. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Mar 2021 08:51:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405861 The appeal was allowed, and both the addition of Rs. 15,20,000 as unexplained cash deposits and the disallowance of Rs. 66,09,875 for commission and development charges were deleted. The Tribunal found the evidence provided by the assessee to be sufficient to explain the deposits and supported the expenditures on commission and development charges. The decision was based on the adequacy of evidence and principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405861