<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25041</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected. The court found insufficient grounds for the delay, noting issues such as delays in obtaining certified copies and sickness of the stenographer. The Revenue failed to provide satisfactory explanations for delays in instructing the lawyer and drafting the application, leading to the rejection of the condonation request without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:36:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 5 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25041</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal to the Supreme Court was rejected. The court found insufficient grounds for the delay, noting issues such as delays in obtaining certified copies and sickness of the stenographer. The Revenue failed to provide satisfactory explanations for delays in instructing the lawyer and drafting the application, leading to the rejection of the condonation request without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>