<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1175 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405847</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the State&#039;s Commercial Taxes Department, thereby upholding the HC&#039;s decision. The HC had affirmed the right of dealers to obtain &quot;C&quot; forms under the CST Act, 1956 for inter-state purchases of High Speed Diesel at concessional rates. The Division Bench dismissed the State&#039;s Writ Appeal, confirming that purchasing dealers could maintain registration under the CST Act. The court emphasized that the benefit of concessional rates applied universally to eligible dealers, not just those party to specific decisions. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1175 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405847</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by the State&#039;s Commercial Taxes Department, thereby upholding the HC&#039;s decision. The HC had affirmed the right of dealers to obtain &quot;C&quot; forms under the CST Act, 1956 for inter-state purchases of High Speed Diesel at concessional rates. The Division Bench dismissed the State&#039;s Writ Appeal, confirming that purchasing dealers could maintain registration under the CST Act. The court emphasized that the benefit of concessional rates applied universally to eligible dealers, not just those party to specific decisions. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>