https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405842 An informant in contempt proceedings is not, by that status alone, an aggrieved party entitled to challenge an order declining to initiate or punish contempt. The contempt jurisdiction remains primarily between the court and the alleged contemnor, so a person who merely alerts the court cannot claim an appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 when no contempt is found. An intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent also cannot be used to bypass that limited statutory appellate scheme. The result is that the contempt appeal was not maintainable and the finding of no contempt remained undisturbed. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405842 An informant in contempt proceedings is not, by that status alone, an aggrieved party entitled to challenge an order declining to initiate or punish contempt. The contempt jurisdiction remains primarily between the court and the alleged contemnor, so a person who merely alerts the court cannot claim an appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 when no contempt is found. An intra-court appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent also cannot be used to bypass that limited statutory appellate scheme. The result is that the contempt appeal was not maintainable and the finding of no contempt remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405842