<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 2 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25017</link>
    <description>Property received on partition by a coparcener is treated as joint family property where he continues to represent the family unit, and income-derived acquisitions in his own name or benami names retain that character. Lands inherited from the father also fall within the Hindu undivided family, while only the share from the grandmother is treated as individual property. Settlements made by the assessee in favour of minor daughters were not clubbable under section 9(2) because that provision applies only to individual assessments, not to assessments on a Hindu undivided family. After remand, the Tribunal could independently decide the reassessment issues, as merger did not make the Commissioner&#039;s earlier findings final.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:48:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 2 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25017</link>
      <description>Property received on partition by a coparcener is treated as joint family property where he continues to represent the family unit, and income-derived acquisitions in his own name or benami names retain that character. Lands inherited from the father also fall within the Hindu undivided family, while only the share from the grandmother is treated as individual property. Settlements made by the assessee in favour of minor daughters were not clubbable under section 9(2) because that provision applies only to individual assessments, not to assessments on a Hindu undivided family. After remand, the Tribunal could independently decide the reassessment issues, as merger did not make the Commissioner&#039;s earlier findings final.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>