<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1160 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405832</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of government subsidy as a capital receipt, employee&#039;s contribution to PF/ESI paid after the due date, interest on delayed payment of excise duty and service tax, and prior period expenses. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s Rule 27 petitions, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and emphasizing procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1160 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405832</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of government subsidy as a capital receipt, employee&#039;s contribution to PF/ESI paid after the due date, interest on delayed payment of excise duty and service tax, and prior period expenses. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s Rule 27 petitions, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and emphasizing procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>