<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1216 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294226</link>
    <description>Processing charges and interest on housing or personal loans were examined for business-expenditure treatment, with the Tribunal holding that the purpose and actual use of the borrowed funds required fresh verification; the section 40(a)(ia) disallowance was also to be reconsidered on the nature of the payees. The section 68 addition for unsecured loans was restored for fresh appellate adjudication because additional evidence and Rule 46A needed proper examination. For section 41(1), the Tribunal held that old creditor balances and non-movement alone do not establish cessation of liability, so the deletion of that addition was sustained. The gross profit addition was moderated and sustained at 2.5%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:25:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1216 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294226</link>
      <description>Processing charges and interest on housing or personal loans were examined for business-expenditure treatment, with the Tribunal holding that the purpose and actual use of the borrowed funds required fresh verification; the section 40(a)(ia) disallowance was also to be reconsidered on the nature of the payees. The section 68 addition for unsecured loans was restored for fresh appellate adjudication because additional evidence and Rule 46A needed proper examination. For section 41(1), the Tribunal held that old creditor balances and non-movement alone do not establish cessation of liability, so the deletion of that addition was sustained. The gross profit addition was moderated and sustained at 2.5%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>