<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1918 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue. It upheld deductions under Section 35(1)(iv), allowed the weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB), and ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under Section 14A. However, the Tribunal directed a partial disallowance of commission payments, emphasizing procedural compliance and factual verification in tax deduction claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1918 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue. It upheld deductions under Section 35(1)(iv), allowed the weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB), and ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance under Section 14A. However, the Tribunal directed a partial disallowance of commission payments, emphasizing procedural compliance and factual verification in tax deduction claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>