<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1142 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405814</link>
    <description>Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging large-scale corporate fraud because the complaint and investigation material disclosed prima facie falsification of accounts, false trade receivables, misuse of letter of credit facilities, and substantial wrongful loss to public sector banks. The Court treated the matter as a serious economic offence affecting public interest and applied the settled bail approach that considers the nature and gravity of the accusation, the supporting material, the accused&#039;s role, and the wider societal impact. Parity with a co-accused, interim protection, and the applicant&#039;s medical condition did not justify release on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:42:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1142 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405814</link>
      <description>Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging large-scale corporate fraud because the complaint and investigation material disclosed prima facie falsification of accounts, false trade receivables, misuse of letter of credit facilities, and substantial wrongful loss to public sector banks. The Court treated the matter as a serious economic offence affecting public interest and applied the settled bail approach that considers the nature and gravity of the accusation, the supporting material, the accused&#039;s role, and the wider societal impact. Parity with a co-accused, interim protection, and the applicant&#039;s medical condition did not justify release on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>