https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405812 The judge granted a stay on the summons issued by State GST authorities, finding it contravened the WBGST Act. The blocking of the electronic credit ledger was deemed not a 'proceeding' under the Act. Affidavits on the validity of Rule 86A of CGST/WBGST Rules and Section 16(2)(c) of CGST/WBGST Act were to be exchanged. Parties had four weeks to file affidavits-in-opposition, with a two-week reply period. The order did not hinder Central GST authorities from continuing lawful actions. The case would resume post-affidavit exchange, with urgent certified copies of the order to be issued to the parties. en-us Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405812 The judge granted a stay on the summons issued by State GST authorities, finding it contravened the WBGST Act. The blocking of the electronic credit ledger was deemed not a 'proceeding' under the Act. Affidavits on the validity of Rule 86A of CGST/WBGST Rules and Section 16(2)(c) of CGST/WBGST Act were to be exchanged. Parties had four weeks to file affidavits-in-opposition, with a two-week reply period. The order did not hinder Central GST authorities from continuing lawful actions. The case would resume post-affidavit exchange, with urgent certified copies of the order to be issued to the parties. Case-Laws GST Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405812