<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405806</link>
    <description>Where the cheque and signature were admitted and statutory notice went unanswered, the presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act remained unrebutted. The defence that the cheque was issued only as security was not supported by credible evidence, and the revisional court declined to reappreciate concurrent findings of fact absent jurisdictional error or illegality. Conviction for cheque dishonour, with the modified sentence and compensation, was therefore left undisturbed in revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:42:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1134 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405806</link>
      <description>Where the cheque and signature were admitted and statutory notice went unanswered, the presumption of legally enforceable debt under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act remained unrebutted. The defence that the cheque was issued only as security was not supported by credible evidence, and the revisional court declined to reappreciate concurrent findings of fact absent jurisdictional error or illegality. Conviction for cheque dishonour, with the modified sentence and compensation, was therefore left undisturbed in revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>