<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1701 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It remanded the determination of the most appropriate method for Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) calculation back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 194C for TDS on marketing sponsorship expenses, affirming the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. The decision was pronounced on 18th September 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:39:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1701 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes. It remanded the determination of the most appropriate method for Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) calculation back to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for reconsideration. The Tribunal upheld the applicability of Section 194C for TDS on marketing sponsorship expenses, affirming the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS. The decision was pronounced on 18th September 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>