<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1099 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, considering the principles of substantial justice and absence of malafide intent, condoned the delay of 43 days in filing appeals against CIT(A) orders for A.Y. 2013-14. The appeals were admitted for adjudication on merits. As the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and sought withdrawal of appeals, the Tribunal allowed the withdrawal, resulting in dismissal of all appeals filed by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 17/03/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2021 07:38:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=640023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1099 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, considering the principles of substantial justice and absence of malafide intent, condoned the delay of 43 days in filing appeals against CIT(A) orders for A.Y. 2013-14. The appeals were admitted for adjudication on merits. As the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and sought withdrawal of appeals, the Tribunal allowed the withdrawal, resulting in dismissal of all appeals filed by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 17/03/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>