https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294210 Where the evidence established homicidal death, ante mortem injuries, and skull fractures sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, the Supreme Court held that the conviction could not be reduced from murder to grievous hurt without legal justification. The medical opinion and ocular evidence supported death by shock and haemorrhage, and the homicidal nature of the incident was undisputed. On that basis, the alteration from Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC to Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC was set aside and the trial court conviction restored. en-us Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Mar 2021 17:53:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294210 Where the evidence established homicidal death, ante mortem injuries, and skull fractures sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, the Supreme Court held that the conviction could not be reduced from murder to grievous hurt without legal justification. The medical opinion and ocular evidence supported death by shock and haemorrhage, and the homicidal nature of the incident was undisputed. On that basis, the alteration from Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC to Section 325 read with Section 34 IPC was set aside and the trial court conviction restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294210