<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 695 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294205</link>
    <description>An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be compounded after conviction has been finally confirmed in revision, because compounding under Section 320 CrPC operates only within the stages and manner permitted by that provision and requires a pending proceeding. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act makes cheque dishonour offences compoundable, but it does not displace the procedural scheme of Section 320 or the finality bar in Section 362 CrPC. The High Court&#039;s inherent power under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to reopen or neutralise a concluded revisional judgment on the basis of a later compromise. The earlier contrary view was overruled to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2024 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 695 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294205</link>
      <description>An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot be compounded after conviction has been finally confirmed in revision, because compounding under Section 320 CrPC operates only within the stages and manner permitted by that provision and requires a pending proceeding. Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act makes cheque dishonour offences compoundable, but it does not displace the procedural scheme of Section 320 or the finality bar in Section 362 CrPC. The High Court&#039;s inherent power under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to reopen or neutralise a concluded revisional judgment on the basis of a later compromise. The earlier contrary view was overruled to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>