<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 633 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294203</link>
    <description>A lawful compromise between the parties in two criminal matters was accepted by the SC after a joint petition placed the settlement before the Court. On that basis, the Court treated the criminal liability arising from the convictions as no longer warranting continuation of the penalties imposed below, and the convictions and sentences were set aside. The appellant was consequently acquitted in both cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 10:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 633 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294203</link>
      <description>A lawful compromise between the parties in two criminal matters was accepted by the SC after a joint petition placed the settlement before the Court. On that basis, the Court treated the criminal liability arising from the convictions as no longer warranting continuation of the penalties imposed below, and the convictions and sentences were set aside. The appellant was consequently acquitted in both cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>