<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25000</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenditures for the construction of a road and tubewells were revenue in nature and not capital. The court allowed the deductions claimed by the assessee, disagreeing with the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the expenditures as capital. The parties were directed to bear their own costs in relation to the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:45:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 34 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25000</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madhya Pradesh ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the expenditures for the construction of a road and tubewells were revenue in nature and not capital. The court allowed the deductions claimed by the assessee, disagreeing with the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat the expenditures as capital. The parties were directed to bear their own costs in relation to the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>