<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1091 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405763</link>
    <description>The court denied the applicant regular bail under Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, due to the seriousness of the offenses and evidence presented. However, the court granted interim bail for 60 days on medical grounds, with conditions that the applicant must not leave the country and must appear before the trial court as directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:50:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1091 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405763</link>
      <description>The court denied the applicant regular bail under Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, due to the seriousness of the offenses and evidence presented. However, the court granted interim bail for 60 days on medical grounds, with conditions that the applicant must not leave the country and must appear before the trial court as directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>