https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405758 The High Court intervened in a case challenging a prohibition order under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, due to a mismatch between physical stock and stock register. The petitioner alleged lack of reconciliation opportunity and coercion during inspection, contesting the confiscation of goods worth nearly Rs. 8.00 crores. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court directed reconciliation of stock variation by a specified date, emphasizing fair adjudication and due process in matters of goods confiscation and release under the Act. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405758 The High Court intervened in a case challenging a prohibition order under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, due to a mismatch between physical stock and stock register. The petitioner alleged lack of reconciliation opportunity and coercion during inspection, contesting the confiscation of goods worth nearly Rs. 8.00 crores. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Court directed reconciliation of stock variation by a specified date, emphasizing fair adjudication and due process in matters of goods confiscation and release under the Act. Case-Laws GST Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405758