<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1052 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405724</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for all assessment years, holding that the penalties imposed under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271AAB were not sustainable due to procedural lapses, vague penalty notices, and inadequate satisfaction recorded by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear and specific penalty notices and adherence to procedural requirements, thereby setting aside the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:49:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1052 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405724</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for all assessment years, holding that the penalties imposed under Sections 271(1)(c) and 271AAB were not sustainable due to procedural lapses, vague penalty notices, and inadequate satisfaction recorded by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the need for clear and specific penalty notices and adherence to procedural requirements, thereby setting aside the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>