https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405722 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant. It concluded that the appellant complied with Rule 6(3A) of CCR, 2004, and the Cenvat credit on input services was admissible. The Tribunal also ruled that the extended limitation period was inapplicable, as no suppression of facts occurred. en-us Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Oct 2024 16:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405722 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant. It concluded that the appellant complied with Rule 6(3A) of CCR, 2004, and the Cenvat credit on input services was admissible. The Tribunal also ruled that the extended limitation period was inapplicable, as no suppression of facts occurred. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405722