<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 39 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24993</link>
    <description>Income from hiring a bulldozer was characterised as income from business rather than income from other sources on the basis that leasing machinery is a common profitmaking commercial activity and can constitute an adventure in the nature of trade. The reasoning relied on precedents distinguishing short-term partletting from systematic leasing, and treated use of idle factory assets during gestation as a business activity. The operative consequence is that rental receipts from the bulldozer are taxable under the head Business and not as Other Sources; the court answered the referred question in favour of the assessee with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 39 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24993</link>
      <description>Income from hiring a bulldozer was characterised as income from business rather than income from other sources on the basis that leasing machinery is a common profitmaking commercial activity and can constitute an adventure in the nature of trade. The reasoning relied on precedents distinguishing short-term partletting from systematic leasing, and treated use of idle factory assets during gestation as a business activity. The operative consequence is that rental receipts from the bulldozer are taxable under the head Business and not as Other Sources; the court answered the referred question in favour of the assessee with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>