<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1434 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294198</link>
    <description>Assessment notices issued under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act were challenged, and the petitioner was first required to be given an opportunity to explain the notices. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to submit an explanation within three weeks. No coercive action is to be taken pursuant to the impugned notices until that explanation is considered. All other contentions were left open for consideration at the appropriate stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2021 08:48:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1434 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294198</link>
      <description>Assessment notices issued under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act were challenged, and the petitioner was first required to be given an opportunity to explain the notices. The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to submit an explanation within three weeks. No coercive action is to be taken pursuant to the impugned notices until that explanation is considered. All other contentions were left open for consideration at the appropriate stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>