<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1038 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405710</link>
    <description>The Court held that the provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act on 19.05.2020 was invalid as there were no pending proceedings under relevant sections. As a result, the order was quashed, leading to the subsequent order on 10.07.2020 being quashed as well. The Court clarified that the respondents could issue a fresh attachment order if it adhered to legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1038 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405710</link>
      <description>The Court held that the provisional attachment order issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act on 19.05.2020 was invalid as there were no pending proceedings under relevant sections. As a result, the order was quashed, leading to the subsequent order on 10.07.2020 being quashed as well. The Court clarified that the respondents could issue a fresh attachment order if it adhered to legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>