<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1019 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405691</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter for verification of asset use before adding to block assets for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that asset use must be established before claiming depreciation under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need to ascertain if assets were used for business activity to claim depreciation, despite no income earned from asset use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1019 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405691</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the matter for verification of asset use before adding to block assets for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13. The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that asset use must be established before claiming depreciation under the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the need to ascertain if assets were used for business activity to claim depreciation, despite no income earned from asset use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>