<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1009 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405681</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the modification of the appointed date by NCLT, Mumbai was unwarranted. The original appointed date of 07.10.2017 was restored, and the compliance period for the directions in the impugned order was extended. The effective date of the scheme would be upon filing the certified copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:32:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1009 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405681</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the modification of the appointed date by NCLT, Mumbai was unwarranted. The original appointed date of 07.10.2017 was restored, and the compliance period for the directions in the impugned order was extended. The effective date of the scheme would be upon filing the certified copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies. The appeal was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>