https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24983 The appellate court allowed the Department's appeal, setting aside the judgment and dismissing the writ petition. It held that the learned single judge's directions were misconceived and emphasized the need for sparing exercise of writ jurisdiction when alternate remedies exist. The petitioner-company was ordered to pay the costs of the Department throughout. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 15:40:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24983 The appellate court allowed the Department's appeal, setting aside the judgment and dismissing the writ petition. It held that the learned single judge's directions were misconceived and emphasized the need for sparing exercise of writ jurisdiction when alternate remedies exist. The petitioner-company was ordered to pay the costs of the Department throughout. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 04 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24983