<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the case for fresh adjudication, stressing the necessity of independently examining each assessment year. It emphasized that relying on previous years&#039; TP analysis without verification contravenes Rule 10B(2) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the case sent back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2021 09:31:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the case for fresh adjudication, stressing the necessity of independently examining each assessment year. It emphasized that relying on previous years&#039; TP analysis without verification contravenes Rule 10B(2) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The taxpayer&#039;s appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the case sent back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=405652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>