<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 675 - ITAT Hyderabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294172</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declared the reassessment proceedings null and void as they were initiated on a protective basis, finding that the original assessment had merged with the appellate order and could not be reopened. The Tribunal also noted that making a protective assessment based on a future contingency was impermissible. As a result, the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 20:46:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 675 - ITAT Hyderabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294172</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declared the reassessment proceedings null and void as they were initiated on a protective basis, finding that the original assessment had merged with the appellate order and could not be reopened. The Tribunal also noted that making a protective assessment based on a future contingency was impermissible. As a result, the reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid, and the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>