<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 1052 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294165</link>
    <description>Proceedings under the Employees State Insurance Act are quasi-judicial and can entail civil consequences for workmen, so the employer and the affected workers are the real parties in interest. Where an employer challenges liability under the Act, the concerned workers, or at least some of them in a representative capacity or through their trade union, must be impleaded and heard before the Employees State Insurance Court. An order passed without giving them an opportunity of hearing is contrary to natural justice. The impugned judgments were set aside and the matter was remanded because the workers or their union had not been impleaded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 1052 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294165</link>
      <description>Proceedings under the Employees State Insurance Act are quasi-judicial and can entail civil consequences for workmen, so the employer and the affected workers are the real parties in interest. Where an employer challenges liability under the Act, the concerned workers, or at least some of them in a representative capacity or through their trade union, must be impleaded and heard before the Employees State Insurance Court. An order passed without giving them an opportunity of hearing is contrary to natural justice. The impugned judgments were set aside and the matter was remanded because the workers or their union had not been impleaded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>