https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294164 The appeal was dismissed as the appellants, not being parties to the contract, could not enforce it. There was no consideration from the appellants to the respondents. The claim of being undisclosed principals lacked supporting consideration and was inconsistent with the contract terms. The price maintenance agreement could not be enforced due to lack of consideration and the appellants' non-party status. The Court of Appeal's judgment was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 1915 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:27:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294164 The appeal was dismissed as the appellants, not being parties to the contract, could not enforce it. There was no consideration from the appellants to the respondents. The claim of being undisclosed principals lacked supporting consideration and was inconsistent with the contract terms. The price maintenance agreement could not be enforced due to lack of consideration and the appellants' non-party status. The Court of Appeal's judgment was affirmed, and the appeal was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Apr 1915 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294164