<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Denied: Appellant&#039;s Claim Rejected Due to Unjust Enrichment; Lacked Required Documentation for Pre-Deposit Status.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57301</link>
    <description>Rejection of refund - Pre-deposit or receivable - principles of unjust enrichment - On the one hand, the appellant claims that the amount paid is to be treated as pre-deposit for which unjust enrichment would not apply, but, on the other hand, fails to furnish the necessary documents requested by the authorities who are empowered to look into all aspects before passing an order. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:58:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=639750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Denied: Appellant&#039;s Claim Rejected Due to Unjust Enrichment; Lacked Required Documentation for Pre-Deposit Status.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57301</link>
      <description>Rejection of refund - Pre-deposit or receivable - principles of unjust enrichment - On the one hand, the appellant claims that the amount paid is to be treated as pre-deposit for which unjust enrichment would not apply, but, on the other hand, fails to furnish the necessary documents requested by the authorities who are empowered to look into all aspects before passing an order. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:58:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>